题主的心情可以理解,但是在这里,可能更好的问题方式是:“一个普通的日本人是如何看待南京大屠杀的”。
参考了高票回答后,我分别前往了 Wiki 、 Twitter 和 Quora 搜索关于所谓"南京事件 (1937年)"的评论以及看法,力求得到一个原生的态度。
截图若有任何可能的侵权行为,请私信,我将立刻删除。
文中“南京大屠杀”,“Nanking Massacre”,“南京事件”均指代日军在侵华期间对南京人民所犯下的滔天罪行。
1. Wiki
首先是 Wiki 上态度的微妙区别,以下分别是中英日三种语言对于 Nanking Massacre 余波的描述:
中 -
https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/南京大屠殺1945年日本投降后,1947年远东国际军事法庭和南京军事法庭认为南京大屠杀中有超过20万的中国人被日军杀害。在中国,自1947年南京军事法庭审判以来,认为约有30万人在大屠杀中遇难。在日本,日本政府承认“发生过杀害非战斗人员和掠夺等行为”,但对遇难人数则暧昧不清。日本学界对遇难人数的估计有20万人、4万人、2万人等几种,也有认为南京大屠杀不存在的“否认派”。“否认派”的论调得到部分日本政商势力的支持,在华人区引起反感,这也使得南京大屠杀成为严重影响中日关系的主要历史问题之一。 英 -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanking_MassacreAlthough the Japanese government has admitted to the killing of a large number of non-combatants, looting, and other violence committed by the Imperial Japanese Army after the fall of Nanking, and Japanese veterans who served there have confirmed that a massacre took place, a small but vocal minority within both the Japanese government and society have argued that the death toll was military in nature and that no such crimes ever occurred. Denial of the massacre and revisionist accounts of the killings have become a staple of Japanese nationalism. In Japan, public opinion of the massacres varies, but few deny outright that the conflict occurred. 日 -
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/南京事件_(1937年)この事件については、事件の規模、虐殺の存否、戦時国際法違反か、犠牲者数などさまざまな論争が存在している(南京事件論争)。事件の真相はいまだ不明である。 中英版本基本上是互相映衬的,但是到了JP方面,态度就开始暧昧了起来:先是很简短的篇幅带过,最后一句事件真相至今未明。在看到这句话的时候,我不禁打了个寒战,同龄的日本学生也许真的就可能打从心里全盘否认“南京事件”的存在。
“毕竟,你看,连维基上都写着真相不明呀!”
2. Twitter
其次是国内民众的反应(多图预警),
楼下刺眼的评论,
以及普通日本居民的反应,
这里只选取了一部分,但也有一定群众的代表性。在搜索之前已经做好了基本的思想准备,但在面对赤裸裸的言论的时候,我的内心依然十分痛苦。
3. Quora
Quora和知乎早期的氛围相对应,属于较为精英的社区,代表的意见相对来说更偏中上层日本居民,有条件的同学请阅读原文(
https://www.quora.com/How-does-the-average-Japanese-view-the-Nanking-Massacre),我这里就只贴部分总结:Anyway, if you can read Japanese, then you can read the work by Ikuhiko Hata. He may not be popular figure in the ‘political’ discussion of Nanking Massacre but he is fairly well regarded by professional historians, both in japan and West. And his number is 40,000 (largely based on Smythe’s survey), and Japanese mainstream view is somewhat above that number (Hata consider summary execution of plain cloth soldier to be outside of ‘massacre’ definition). If I’m forced to produce average Japanese view then I would say 40,000 to 50,000. Yes, it is very different from official and politically correct figure of 300,000. ...In my experience, no. Most people know it happened and don't deny it, but they aren't in a hurry to talk about it either. ...One might understand that defensive attitude a little by looking at the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs. Unlike Nanjing, world opinion remains very divided on the a-bombs, yet I notice that whenever someone brings up the topic, many Americans seem to get very defensive all of the sudden. 另外,在回答这个问题时候,APA刚好宣布了它的公开意见书(
The official statement of APA Group about the freshly raised controversy over the paragraph of the our-room-equipped book),这里作为一则阅读材料供有兴趣的同学了解,但其实际态度与视频中提供的论点无异,甚至只是提供支撑而已。
可以看到,所谓的“伪造”就是刻在他们骨子里的“真实”;对待自己认为的“真实”,自然也不会有任何羞愧之意。
最后,总结一下就是:
日本民众间存在的巨大的分歧,远超出我们的想象。作为中国的一名普通学生,我会采取的行为是保持安全的距离,并留意自己的背后。
你看的到是菊与刀,看不到的却是泥土和血迹。 |