海阔天空√ 发表于 2023-9-17 01:41:02

日本核污水排海为什么没有人去排海地附近测量辐射水平？

如题。

o0runner 发表于 2023-9-17 01:41:29

先问是不是：
IAEA Conducts Its First Seawater Sampling After Japan’s Discharge of ALPS Treated Water, Finds Tritium Level Below Limit
http://picx.zhimg.com/v2-63c72ff31502e564727a0871597a54df_r.jpg?source=1940ef5c

IAEA staff sampling seawater from the coast near the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station as part of the Agency’s safety review of the ALPS treated water discharge (TEPCO)

http://pica.zhimg.com/v2-8b983b9db593bb81f52d506a3186741b_r.jpg?source=1940ef5c

IAEA staff sampling seawater within three kilometres from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station as part of the Agency’s safety review of the ALPS treated water discharge (Photo: TEPCO)

不仅有测，而且从11年开始就自行采样测量
The IAEA has been collecting marine samples in the waters off Fukushimaover the past decade, following a request by the Japanese Government toassist it in ensuring that its sea area monitoring – conducted since theaccident in 2011 - maintains a high quality, and is credible andtransparent. 全文如下：
The International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA) first independentsampling and analysis of seawater near the Fukushima Daiichi NuclearPower Station (FDNPS) since discharges of ALPS treated water started on 24 August confirms that the tritium levels are below Japan’s operational limit.
Agencystaff present at the IAEA’s Office at the site sampled seawater fromseveral locations within three kilometres from the site, at sea and fromthe coast.
The Agency’s independent sampling and measurement ofthe seawater from the coast shows consistency with the values reportedby Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) - operator of the FDNPS - aswell as the Ministry of Environment of Japan. TEPCO reports daily publicresults on its website showing that the tritium activity concentrationin the sea falls below its operational limit, that is, the limit set foroperation of the ALPS discharge process that must not be exceeded. TheAgency is continuing its analysis of all the seawater samples.
The IAEA’s safety review of Japan’s plan to release the treated water into the sea, carried out before the discharge started, concludedthat Japan’s approach and activities to discharge ALPS-treated waterare consistent with relevant international safety standards. The reportnoted that the controlled, gradual discharges of the treated water intothe sea, as currently planned and assessed by TEPCO, would have anegligible radiological impact on people and the environment.
TheIAEA has been collecting marine samples in the waters off Fukushima overthe past decade, following a request by the Japanese Government toassist it in ensuring that its sea area monitoring – conducted since theaccident in 2011 - maintains a high quality, and is credible andtransparent. The project is a follow-up activity to recommendations madeon marine monitoring in a report by the IAEA in 2013 related to the decommissioning of the FDNPS plant.

tzjj 发表于 2023-9-17 01:42:19

http://picx.zhimg.com/v2-fb6ad1b55466789f0da76108e14e211f_r.jpg?source=1940ef5c
这么大的消息居然没有一点热搜？于是我去RT今日俄罗斯看了一下
这不看不知道一看吓一跳

http://pic1.zhimg.com/v2-4ed4ce6fe69e443d90ecd206c6d19918_r.jpg?source=1940ef5c

http://pic1.zhimg.com/v2-e578dc1a35bae9ecba9a12a0cb1f35c3_r.jpg?source=1940ef5c

http://pic1.zhimg.com/v2-36c217af7a20c6ab36f65c18519b70a3_r.jpg?source=1940ef5c

http://pica.zhimg.com/v2-8c69edd5a395d4816604502d6fee370d_r.jpg?source=1940ef5c

http://pic1.zhimg.com/v2-f1636a0f9b7954c85bcdf686b3784330_r.jpg?source=1940ef5c

http://picx.zhimg.com/v2-48b7c5dac7f6e471c8f81f8698421127_r.jpg?source=1940ef5c

http://pic1.zhimg.com/v2-bf1b83c2a690c79bea0c0d0725f58d97_r.jpg?source=1940ef5c
压根就没什么科考船被登船检查的消息

http://pic1.zhimg.com/v2-ed1ef8865b63d3ad598c4d105bc3535c_r.jpg?source=1940ef5c
反倒是有俄罗斯对核污水检测表明核污水没有影响的新闻

http://picx.zhimg.com/v2-e4fc061eb90862e0dd3bd40e3f302108_r.jpg?source=1940ef5c
在不存在的网站上有关这两者的新闻还是上次中俄海军日常绕日本遛弯呢

http://picx.zhimg.com/v2-4842b10ac42dd743bd8452a362aa2caf_r.jpg?source=1940ef5c
@未名湖畔铁拳虎 所以请问你所谓登船的新闻在哪里呢？
造谁的谣不好居然造俄罗斯的谣，你忘了俄罗斯在中国有官媒的了？

http://pic1.zhimg.com/v2-4ce33569780b650d5a295729a586c007_r.jpg?source=1940ef5c

http://picx.zhimg.com/v2-badc3f03695733aa8549ec0a1db7bbb7_r.jpg?source=1940ef5c
绿色和平组织一群NGO都能跑核电站周边采样，VMF虽然菜的抠脚但不至于连NGO都不如吧
当然可能是我不会搜，那么我们去俄罗斯外交部看看

http://pica.zhimg.com/v2-d90030cd04c5bbaa625cb69dfa650538_r.jpg?source=1940ef5c
以日本为关键词检索，最近的几条推文是：
扎哈罗娃日常喷日本
纪念胜利纪念日
抗议岸田文雄的反俄宣传，因为这对在日俄罗斯人造成了困扰
以及………哀悼东京大轰炸，广岛，长崎原爆死难的日本人

艾哥 发表于 2023-9-17 01:42:31

现在不需要去，别掉进日本的圈套。
日本核污染水排海，目前是日本需要提供自证证明，需要日本自己证明对环境没有影响!
日本只要没有提供中国认可的证明、证据和方案，中国就可以继续制裁措施，并且慢慢加码!
沉住气，慢慢玩，不着急! 凭什么让我们去给他背书弄证明证据。

wsf960530 发表于 2023-9-17 01:42:48

俄罗斯科考船去了，被日本海上自卫队团团围住登船检查不让采样不许检测…
不仅俄罗斯不许去，国际原子能机构也不许去。所谓的IAEA数据，完全是日本东电自己采样自己检测，然后日本人把数据给IAEA。
1956年，日本水俣病事件，也是日本的污染水排泄事件。当时舆论质疑排出的水不安全。结果日本官员和企业老板当众喝下处理后的污染水。这该安全了吧？结果两万日本人受害，很多人两三年内就悲惨死去。后来曝光，日本官员和企业老板喝的水根本就不是处理后的污染水，而是早就掉包的干净的水。
对日本人的话，一个字都不能信！核污水如果真的处理过是安全的，日本人为啥不肯让中韩直接去排水口甚至污水处理设备取样检测？怕自己的水太干净处理的太好的事被中韩证实？

foxfly 发表于 2023-9-17 01:43:29

因为真正需要被检测的是那1000个罐子里的水
问为什么不去排海地附近监测的都是被日本绕进去的
说韩国去的，人家只是在自己国家海域检测，到远处太平洋公海去也是形式大于意义
目前除了东电
没人可以测排污口的水
另外
明明错的是日本
非法排放未经查明放射性成分的核污水
为什么一个个脑子清奇要先默认别人可以排
然后装可爱问别的国家为啥不去看着
页: [1]
查看完整版本: 日本核污水排海为什么没有人去排海地附近测量辐射水平？